Mitsubishi L 200 2015 vs Chevrolet Tahoe 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 6.2 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Mitsubishi L 200) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Chevrolet Tahoe) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 154 HP | 426 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 624 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 272 HP less power than Chevrolet Tahoe, whereas torque is 244 NM less than Chevrolet Tahoe. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 12.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 13.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Tahoe, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi L 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 750 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 4.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Tahoe. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 98 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi L 200 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.21 m | 5.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 2.04 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.89 m | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 is 2 cm longer than the Chevrolet Tahoe, 26 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 433 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 433 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2681 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Tahoe. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 41 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Chevrolet Tahoe has
| |