Mitsubishi L 200 2015 vs Audi Q7 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 154 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Audi Q7 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi L 200 engine produces 86 HP less power than Audi Q7, whereas torque is 170 NM less than Audi Q7. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi L 200 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 9.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi L 200 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi L 200 consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.21 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 is 12 cm longer than the Audi Q7, 20 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 775 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2035 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi Q7. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`850 | 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 400 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |