Mitsubishi L 200 2023 vs Isuzu D-Max 2025
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 | 1.9 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 - 201 HP | 163 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 194 - 470 NM | 325 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.1 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 8.5 | 6.3 - 9.0 | |
|
On average, Mitsubishi L 200 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 228 - 240 mm (9 - 9.4 inches) | 210 - 235 mm (8.3 - 9.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi L 200 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.32 m | 5.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi L 200 is 4 cm longer than the Isuzu D-Max, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Isuzu D-Max. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`920 kg | ~ 3`109 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`907 kg | ~ 2`031 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 1`013 kg | ~ 1`078 kg | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 6 procentiem less than Isuzu D-Max. Therefore, Isuzu D-Max is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Isuzu D-Max has
| |