Mitsubishi L 200 2018 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.3 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 181 HP | 140 - 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 - 430 NM | 340 - 580 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.4 - 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 - 8.6 | 7.6 - 8.3 | |
|
On average, Mitsubishi L 200 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 192 mm (7.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi L 200 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.27 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.95 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.83 m | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 is 2 cm longer than the Volkswagen Amarok, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1061 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Amarok, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`850 | ~ 3`029 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 000 | 34 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
| |