Mitsubishi L 200 2018 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi Outlander can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mitsubishi L 200 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.3 - 2.4 (diesel) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 181 HP | 121 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 - 430 NM | 190 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.7 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 - 8.6 | 1.7 - 10.6 | |
|
On average, Mitsubishi L 200 equipped with diesel engines consume 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 190 - 216 mm (7.5 - 8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi L 200 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.27 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is larger. Mitsubishi L 200 is 58 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1061 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1792 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi L 200 has 511 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`850 | ~ 2`182 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 30 000 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |