Mitsubishi L 200 2018 vs Ford Ranger 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.3 - 2.4 | 2.2 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 181 HP | 130 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 - 430 NM | 330 - 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.6 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 - 8.6 | 6.9 - 8.9 | |
|
On average, Mitsubishi L 200 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.27 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 9 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1061 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`850 | ~ 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 000 | 31 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
| |