Mitsubishi L 200 2018 vs Ford F150 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi L 200 is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Ford F150 is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 2.3 - 2.4 | 2.7 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 181 HP | 290 - 450 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 - 430 NM | 359 - 691 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 - 8.6 | 10.7 - 14.7 | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 292 mm (11.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford F150 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.27 m | 5.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.92 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 62 cm shorter than the Ford F150, 21 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1061 litres | 2192 litres | |
|
Ford F150 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi L 200 has 1131 litres less trunk space than the Ford F150. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`850 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 800 | 55 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Ford F150 has
| |