Mitsubishi L 200 1996 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.7 - 4.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 87 - 132 HP | 140 - 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 - 240 NM | 295 - 425 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 23.7 seconds | 8.3 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 9.7 - 16.5 | |
|
On average, Mitsubishi L 200 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 215 - 235 mm (8.5 - 9.3 inches) | 210 - 211 mm (8.3 - 8.3 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.79 m | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 is 3 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`690 | ~ 2`447 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |