Mitsubishi L 200 1996 vs Nissan Navara 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi L 200 is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Nissan Navara is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan Navara can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mitsubishi L 200 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.4 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 87 - 132 HP | 133 - 148 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 - 240 NM | 208 - 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 23.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 5.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.77 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 58 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`690 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |