Mitsubishi L 200 1996 vs Dacia Logan 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Dacia Logan is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Dacia Logan can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.1 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 87 - 132 HP | 70 - 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 - 240 NM | 107 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 23.7 seconds | 10.2 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 4.3 - 7.1 | |
|
On average, Mitsubishi L 200 equipped with diesel engines consume 5.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 215 - 235 mm (8.5 - 9.3 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi L 200 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.52 m | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 is 35 cm longer than the Dacia Logan, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 510 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`690 kg | ~ 1`548 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`703 kg | ~ 1`023 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 987 kg | ~ 525 kg | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 47 procentiem more than Dacia Logan. Therefore, Mitsubishi L 200 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |