Mitsubishi L 200 2006 vs Isuzu D-Max 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Isuzu D-Max can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Isuzu D-Max also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 | 2.5 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 168 HP | 136 - 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 - 402 NM | 280 - 333 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.6 seconds | 20 - 25.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 - 9.5 | 7.4 - 9.0 | |
|
On average, Mitsubishi L 200 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is larger. Mitsubishi L 200 is 3 cm longer than the Isuzu D-Max, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`870 | ~ 2`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Isuzu D-Max has
| |