Mitsubishi L 200 2010 vs Toyota Hilux 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 | 2.5 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 178 HP | 144 - 171 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 - 400 NM | 343 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 - 17.8 seconds | 12 - 13.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 8.7 | 7.3 - 8.6 | |
|
On average, Mitsubishi L 200 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Hilux. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.16 m | 5.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 10 cm shorter than the Toyota Hilux, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 900 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 13.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 1.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Hilux, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`875 | ~ 2`717 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Toyota Hilux has
| |