Mitsubishi L 200 2010 vs Nissan Navara 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan Navara can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 | 2.5 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 178 HP | 190 - 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 - 400 NM | 403 - 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 - 17.8 seconds | 9.3 - 11.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 8.7 | 8.3 - 9.5 | |
|
On average, Mitsubishi L 200 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.16 m | 5.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 18 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 13.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 1.5 metres less than that of the Nissan Navara, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`875 | ~ 2`873 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
| |