Mitsubishi L 200 2010 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 | 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 178 HP | 154 - 181 HP | |
| Torque: | 314 - 400 NM | 380 - 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 - 17.8 seconds | 10.4 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 8.7 | 7.1 - 7.5 | |
|
On average, Mitsubishi L 200 2010 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200 2015. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.16 m | 5.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi L 200 2010 is 5 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi L 200 2015, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`875 | ~ 2`864 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 14 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |