Mitsubishi L 200 2015 vs Toyota Hilux 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi L 200 is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota Hilux can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Toyota Hilux also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 | 2.4 - 2.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 154 - 181 HP | 150 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 - 430 NM | 400 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 - 12.2 seconds | 12.8 - 13.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 7.5 | 7.0 - 8.0 | |
|
On average, Mitsubishi L 200 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Hilux. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 200 - 205 mm (7.9 - 8.1 inches) | 293 mm (11.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Hilux can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.21 m | 5.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 13 cm shorter than the Toyota Hilux, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 13.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 1.6 metres less than that of the Toyota Hilux, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`864 | ~ 3`095 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 400 | 22 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Toyota Hilux has
| |