Mitsubishi L 200 2015 vs Nissan Navara 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 | 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 154 - 181 HP | 160 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 - 430 NM | 403 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 - 12.2 seconds | 10.8 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 7.5 | 6.4 - 7.0 | |
|
On average, Mitsubishi L 200 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 200 - 205 mm (7.9 - 8.1 inches) | 600 mm (23.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Navara can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.21 m | 5.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
|
Mitsubishi L 200 is smaller. Mitsubishi L 200 is 10 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi L 200 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi L 200 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan Navara, which means Mitsubishi L 200 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`864 | ~ 3`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 400 | 19 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi L 200 has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |