Mitsubishi Grandis 2005 vs Hyundai H1 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Grandis engine produces 4 HP less power than Hyundai H1, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Hyundai H1. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Grandis reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Grandis is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Grandis consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai H1, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Grandis over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Grandis consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai H1. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Grandis gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Mitsubishi Grandis) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Hyundai H1) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.88 m | |
| Mitsubishi Grandis is 7 cm longer than the Hyundai H1, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Grandis is 22 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 320 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1545 litres | 4400 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai H1 (by 2855 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`340 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Grandis has
|
Hyundai H1 has
| |