Mitsubishi Grandis 2004 vs Ford Galaxy 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 165 HP | 130 - 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 217 - 310 NM | 190 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 11.7 seconds | 10.5 - 11.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 10.0 | 6.5 - 8.2 | |
|
Mitsubishi Grandis petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Galaxy. On average, Mitsubishi Grandis equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Grandis is smaller. Mitsubishi Grandis is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Grandis is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1545 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Galaxy has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Grandis has 70 litres less trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Grandis is 0.6 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Mitsubishi Grandis can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`295 | ~ 1`768 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Grandis has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |