Mitsubishi Grandis 2004 vs Chrysler Voyager 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 2.4 - 3.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 165 HP | 140 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 217 - 310 NM | 218 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 11.7 seconds | 11.9 - 14.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 10.0 | 7.7 - 12.7 | |
|
Mitsubishi Grandis petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Voyager. On average, Mitsubishi Grandis equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Grandis is smaller. Mitsubishi Grandis is 5 cm shorter than the Chrysler Voyager, 20 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Grandis is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1545 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler Voyager has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Grandis has 120 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Grandis is 0.5 metres less than that of the Chrysler Voyager, which means Mitsubishi Grandis can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`295 | ~ 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Grandis has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |