Mitsubishi Grandis 2004 vs Ford S-Max 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 1.8 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 165 HP | 100 - 220 HP | |
| Torque: | 217 - 310 NM | 190 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 11.7 seconds | 7.9 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 10.0 | 6.2 - 9.7 | |
|
Mitsubishi Grandis petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford S-Max. On average, a Mitsubishi Grandis with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Ford S-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Grandis is smaller. Mitsubishi Grandis is 1 cm shorter than the Ford S-Max, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 854 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1545 litres | 2100 litres | |
|
Ford S-Max has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Grandis has 534 litres less trunk space than the Ford S-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford S-Max (by 555 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Grandis is 0.6 metres less than that of the Ford S-Max, which means Mitsubishi Grandis can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`295 | ~ 2`433 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Grandis has
|
Ford S-Max has
| |