Mitsubishi Grandis 2004 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 165 HP | 110 - 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 217 - 310 NM | 170 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 11.7 seconds | 12.1 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 10.0 | 5.7 - 8.9 | |
|
Mitsubishi Grandis petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C4 Picasso. On average, Mitsubishi Grandis equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mitsubishi Grandis is 29 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Grandis is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1545 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Grandis has 180 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Grandis uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Grandis is 0.3 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`295 | ~ 1`426 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |