Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 2019 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 249 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross engine produces 28 HP less power than Mazda CX-30, but torque is 25 NM more than Mazda CX-30. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 5.6 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross could require 465 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 203 mm (8 inches) | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 2019 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda CX-30 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mazda CX-30 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is larger. Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is 1 cm longer than the Mazda CX-30, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 640 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1385 litres | 1406 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross has 210 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-30. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-30 (by 21 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-30, which means Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 23 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |