Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 2018 vs Honda CR-V 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 243 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross engine produces 27 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 7 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 183 mm (7.2 inches) | 198 mm (7.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Honda CR-V can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Honda CR-V version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from nine 4x4 versions of Honda CR-V 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is smaller, but slightly higher. Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is 18 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 378 litres | 497 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1159 litres | 1110 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross has 119 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross (by 49 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`150 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 22 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |