Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 2018 vs Audi Q5 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross engine produces 86 HP less power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Audi Q5. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A6, Audi Q7, Volkswagen Touareg | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi Q5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Audi Q5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is smaller, but slightly higher. Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is 26 cm shorter than the Audi Q5, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 378 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1159 litres | 1510 litres | |
|
Audi Q5 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross has 172 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q5 (by 351 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is 1.1 metres less than that of the Audi Q5, which means Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`150 | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 26 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |