Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 2017 vs Hyundai Kona 2018

 
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
2017 - 2021
Hyundai Kona
2018 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.3 Diesel2.0 Petrol
Diesel (Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Hyundai Kona) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences."

Performance

Power: 150 HP149 HP
Torque: 400 NM180 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a secondsn/a seconds
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross engine produces 1 HP more power than Hyundai Kona, whereas torque is 220 NM more than Hyundai Kona.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no datano data
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 183 mm (7.2 inches)170 mm (6.7 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.41 m4.17 m
Width: 1.81 m1.80 m
Height: 1.69 m1.55 m
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is larger.
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is 24 cm longer than the Hyundai Kona, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is 14 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 341 litres544 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
448 litres1297 litres
Hyundai Kona has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross has 203 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Kona. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Kona (by 849 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data1`900
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data14 800
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross has
  • higher ground clearance
Hyundai Kona has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv