Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 2017 vs Nissan Qashqai 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross and Nissan Qashqai have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross torque is 10 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 183 mm (7.2 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.59 m | |
| Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is 1 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 341 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1140 litres | 1585 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross has 89 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 445 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is 0.1 metres less than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`150 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |