Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 2017 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-30 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross engine produces 17 HP less power than Mazda CX-30, but torque is 26 NM more than Mazda CX-30. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 5.6 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 183 mm (7.2 inches) | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda CX-30 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mazda CX-30 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is larger. Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is 1 cm longer than the Mazda CX-30, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 341 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1140 litres | 1406 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-30 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross has 89 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-30. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-30 (by 266 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-30, which means Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`150 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 23 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |