Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 2017 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.3 | 1.8 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 163 HP | 116 - 189 HP | |
| Torque: | 249 - 400 NM | 213 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 10.3 seconds | 8.3 - 12.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 8.7 | 4.4 - 6.4 | |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-30. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 183 - 216 mm (7.2 - 8.5 inches) | 175 - 180 mm (6.9 - 7.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is larger. Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is 1 cm longer than the Mazda CX-30, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 640 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1385 litres | 1406 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross has 210 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-30. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-30 (by 21 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-30, which means Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`110 | ~ 1`986 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 23 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |