Mitsubishi Colt 2005 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Mitsubishi Colt 2005) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mitsubishi Colt 2008) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.4 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt 2008 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Colt 2005 engine produces 41 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt 2008, but torque is 15 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt 2008. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Colt 2005 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 6.2 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt 2005 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Colt 2005 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt 2008, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Colt 2005 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt 2005 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.55 m | |
| Mitsubishi Colt 2005 is 13 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt 2008, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Colt 2005 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 155 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
760 litres | 1032 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt 2008 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt 2005 has 65 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt 2008. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Colt 2008 (by 272 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`545 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |