Mitsubishi Colt 2000 vs Toyota Corolla 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 141 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Toyota Corolla is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 7 HP less power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Toyota Corolla. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.0 | |
|
The Toyota Corolla is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Colt consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Corolla gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is smaller. Mitsubishi Colt is 41 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |