Mitsubishi Colt 2000 vs Peugeot 206 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 141 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 206 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 7 HP less power than Peugeot 206, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Peugeot 206. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 6.4 | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Colt consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Peugeot 206 2005 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 206 2005 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is larger, but lower. Mitsubishi Colt is 6 cm longer than the Peugeot 206, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
830 litres | 992 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.1 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`500 kg | 1`567 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`015 kg | 1`013 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 485 kg | 554 kg | |
| Mitsubishi Colt load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem less than Peugeot 206. Therefore, Peugeot 206 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |