Mitsubishi Colt 2000 vs Toyota Yaris 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 141 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Toyota Yaris is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 3 HP less power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Toyota Yaris. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 6.9 | |
|
The Toyota Yaris is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Colt consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Yaris gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Toyota Yaris 2003 1.5 engine: The NZ engine series was specifically developed by Toyota for compact cars. First introduced in 1997, these engines are still in production today, proving their longevity and reliability. With proper ... More about Toyota Yaris 2003 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is larger, but lower. Mitsubishi Colt is 24 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 305 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 950 litres | |
|
Toyota Yaris has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Colt has 65 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Colt uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Yaris (by 120 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.6 metres less than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`390 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Toyota Yaris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Colt has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Toyota Yaris, so Toyota Yaris quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |