Mitsubishi Colt 2000 vs Mazda 2 2007

 
Mitsubishi Colt
2000 - 2003
Mazda 2
2007 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 103 HP103 HP
Torque: 141 NM137 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds10.4 seconds
Mitsubishi Colt and Mazda 2 have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi Colt torque is 4 NM more than Mazda 2. Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.45.9
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mitsubishi Colt consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 375 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres43 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 590 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
720 km on highway870 km on highway
Mazda 2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.88 m3.90 m
Width: 1.68 m1.70 m
Height: 1.36 m1.48 m
Mitsubishi Colt is smaller.
Mitsubishi Colt is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 12 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 240 litres250 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
830 litres787 litres
Mitsubishi Colt has 10 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Colt (by 43 litres).
Turning diameter: 10 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 2.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5001`485
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

high
Mazda 2 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Colt has serious deffects in 215 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 8002200
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Colt has
  • lower price
Mazda 2 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv