Mitsubishi Colt 2000 vs Peugeot 206 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 141 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 206 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 7 HP less power than Peugeot 206, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Peugeot 206. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Peugeot 206 2005 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 206 2005 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is larger, but lower. Mitsubishi Colt is 6 cm longer than the Peugeot 206, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 992 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has 5 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 206. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 162 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.1 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`590 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |