Mitsubishi Colt 2000 vs Seat Ibiza 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 141 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 3 HP more power than Seat Ibiza, but torque is 4 NM less than Seat Ibiza. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 8.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 530 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.42 m | |
| Mitsubishi Colt and Seat Ibiza are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | no data | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has 10 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ibiza. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.5 metres less than that of the Seat Ibiza, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Ibiza, so Mitsubishi Colt quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
| |