Mitsubishi Colt 2007 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 34 HP less power than Chrysler PT Cruiser, whereas torque is 75 NM less than Chrysler PT Cruiser. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 10.4 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Colt consumes 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Colt over 15,000 km in a year you can save 570 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 540 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is smaller. Mitsubishi Colt is 42 cm shorter than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 190 litres | 210 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has 20 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler PT Cruiser. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 1.2 metres less than that of the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler PT Cruiser has serious deffects in 115 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |