Mitsubishi Colt 2007 vs Opel Tigra 2004

 
Mitsubishi Colt
2007 - 2009
Opel Tigra
2004 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 109 HP90 HP
Torque: 145 NM125 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds12.4 seconds
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive.
Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 19 HP more power than Opel Tigra, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Opel Tigra. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.66.1
The Opel Tigra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Tigra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 47 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 710 km in combined cycle730 km in combined cycle
870 km on highway900 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 3.88 m3.92 m
Width: 1.70 m1.68 m
Height: 1.45 m1.36 m
Mitsubishi Colt is 5 cm shorter than the Opel Tigra, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 190 litres250 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data440 litres
Opel Tigra has more luggage space.
Mitsubishi Colt has 60 litres less trunk space than the Opel Tigra.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.1 metres more than that of the Opel Tigra.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`450
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

below average
Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Tigra has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably better
Average price (€): 30002600
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Colt has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
Opel Tigra has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv