Mitsubishi Colt 2007 vs Audi TT 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 5.9 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 141 HP less power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 175 NM less than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Colt over 15,000 km in a year you can save 435 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Colt is 31 cm shorter than the Audi TT, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 190 litres | 250 litres | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 60 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi TT. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`810 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Audi TT has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Colt has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Audi TT, so Audi TT quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Audi TT has
| |