Mitsubishi Colt 1996 vs Mazda 2 2007

 
Mitsubishi Colt
1996 - 2001
Mazda 2
2007 - 2010
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 90 HP103 HP
Torque: 137 NM137 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.3 seconds12.1 seconds
Mazda 2 is a more dynamic driving.
Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 13 HP less power than Mazda 2, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.26.8
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mitsubishi Colt consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 210 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres43 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 600 km in combined cycle630 km in combined cycle
730 km on highway780 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 3.88 m3.89 m
Width: 1.68 m1.70 m
Height: 1.36 m1.48 m
Mitsubishi Colt is smaller.
Mitsubishi Colt and Mazda 2 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 240 litres250 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
830 litres787 litres
Mitsubishi Colt has 10 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Colt (by 43 litres).
Turning diameter: 10 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 2.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4801`490
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

high
Mazda 2 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Colt has serious deffects in 750 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 8002200
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Colt has
  • lower price
Mazda 2 has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv