Mitsubishi Colt 1996 vs Mazda 2 2007
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 103 HP | |
Torque: | 137 NM | 137 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
Mazda 2 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 13 HP less power than Mazda 2, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 6.8 | |
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Colt consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 43 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
730 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.88 m | 3.89 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.36 m | 1.48 m | |
Mitsubishi Colt is smaller. Mitsubishi Colt and Mazda 2 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 250 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 787 litres | |
Mitsubishi Colt has 10 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Colt (by 43 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 2. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`490 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | high | |
Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Colt has serious deffects in 750 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |