Mitsubishi Colt 1996 vs Toyota Corolla 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Toyota Corolla is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 20 HP less power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Toyota Corolla. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is smaller. Mitsubishi Colt is 41 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Toyota Corolla has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Colt has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla, so Toyota Corolla quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |