Mitsubishi Colt 1996 vs Opel Astra 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 10 HP less power than Opel Astra, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Opel Astra. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Astra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is smaller. Mitsubishi Colt is 23 cm shorter than the Opel Astra, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 1180 litres | |
|
Opel Astra has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 130 litres less trunk space than the Opel Astra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Astra (by 350 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.1 metres less than that of the Opel Astra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`625 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Astra has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Opel Astra has
| |