Mitsubishi Colt 1996 vs Nissan Almera 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 NM | 128 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt and Nissan Almera have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi Colt torque is 9 NM more than Nissan Almera. Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Almera is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Almera gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is smaller. Mitsubishi Colt is 30 cm shorter than the Nissan Almera, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 355 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 1100 litres | |
|
Nissan Almera has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Colt has 115 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Almera. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera (by 270 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.4 metres less than that of the Nissan Almera, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Nissan Almera has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Colt has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Nissan Almera, so Nissan Almera quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |