Mitsubishi Colt 1996 vs Peugeot 206 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.8 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 206 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Colt and Peugeot 206 have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi Colt torque is 12 NM less than Peugeot 206. Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 520 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is larger, but lower. Mitsubishi Colt is 6 cm longer than the Peugeot 206, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 992 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has 5 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 206. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 162 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.1 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`450 | 1`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Peugeot 206 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Colt has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Peugeot 206, so Peugeot 206 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |