Mitsubishi Colt 1996 vs Seat Ibiza 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.8 seconds | 15.1 seconds | |
|
Seat Ibiza is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 15 HP more power than Seat Ibiza, but torque is 8 NM less than Seat Ibiza. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 520 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Ibiza gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.42 m | |
| Mitsubishi Colt and Seat Ibiza are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 782 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has 10 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ibiza. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Colt (by 48 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.5 metres less than that of the Seat Ibiza, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`450 | 1`415 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Seat Ibiza, so Mitsubishi Colt quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |