Mitsubishi Colt 1996 vs Skoda Felicia 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 NM | 106 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 7 HP more power than Skoda Felicia, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Skoda Felicia. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Felicia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Felicia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Felicia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is larger, but lower. Mitsubishi Colt is 2 cm longer than the Skoda Felicia, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Felicia, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`445 | 900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Skoda Felicia has
| |