Mitsubishi Colt 1996 vs Skoda Felicia 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 NM | 100 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 7 HP more power than Skoda Felicia, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Skoda Felicia. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is larger, but lower. Mitsubishi Colt is 2 cm longer than the Skoda Felicia, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Felicia, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`445 | 900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Skoda Felicia has
| |