Mitsubishi Colt 1996 vs Skoda Felicia 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Skoda Felicia is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Colt and Skoda Felicia have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi Colt torque is 27 NM less than Skoda Felicia. Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is larger, but lower. Mitsubishi Colt is 2 cm longer than the Skoda Felicia, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Felicia, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`445 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Skoda Felicia has
| |