Mitsubishi Colt 1996 vs Seat Ibiza 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 15 HP more power than Seat Ibiza, but torque is 8 NM less than Seat Ibiza. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is larger, but lower. Mitsubishi Colt is 7 cm longer than the Seat Ibiza, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 580 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Colt has 30 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ibiza. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Colt uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Colt (by 250 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.2 metres more than that of the Seat Ibiza. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`445 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ibiza has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |