Mitsubishi Colt 1996 vs Peugeot 106 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 NM | 88 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 15 HP more power than Peugeot 106, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Peugeot 106. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.7 | |
| Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 106, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.59 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is larger, but slightly lower. Mitsubishi Colt is 20 cm longer than the Peugeot 106, 9 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Colt is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 953 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has 25 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 106. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 106 (by 123 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.6 metres less than that of the Peugeot 106, which means Mitsubishi Colt can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`445 | 1`295 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 106 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
| |