Mitsubishi Colt 1996 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 72 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 NM | 104 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 3 HP more power than Chevrolet Aveo, whereas torque is 4 NM more than Chevrolet Aveo. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
| By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Lancer | Used also on Chevrolet Kalos | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Colt might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.49 m | |
| Mitsubishi Colt and Chevrolet Aveo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 175 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
830 litres | 980 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has 65 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Aveo (by 150 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.2 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`445 kg | 1`445 kg | |
| Net weight: | 945 kg | 990 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 500 kg | 455 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Chevrolet Aveo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mitsubishi Colt, so Chevrolet Aveo quality could be a bit better. | ||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |