Mitsubishi Colt 1996 vs Chevrolet Aveo 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 72 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 NM | 104 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Colt engine produces 3 HP more power than Chevrolet Aveo, whereas torque is 4 NM more than Chevrolet Aveo. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Colt reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Colt could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Colt consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Lancer | Used also on Chevrolet Kalos | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Colt might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.49 m | |
| Mitsubishi Colt and Chevrolet Aveo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 175 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 980 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has 65 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Aveo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Aveo (by 150 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Colt is 0.2 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Aveo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`445 | 1`445 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Chevrolet Aveo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mitsubishi Colt, so Chevrolet Aveo quality could be a bit better. | ||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Colt has
|
Chevrolet Aveo has
| |